Dealing with the increasingly common pin-fit problem - Transmission Digest

Dealing with the increasingly common pin-fit problem

I want to talk a little bit about a common diagnostic misstep or overlooked problem that is prevalent in the automotive repair industry and seems to be on the rise. Pin-fit or tension can deal us a fit sometimes (pun intended), especially if we do not have the proper tools to determine if this mode of failure might be the cause. I have a couple of case studies to share that I have seen recently, and will share some testing protocols that I have used over the years to attempt to correctly diagnose a related issue or a code. 

My first case study involves a 2010 Ford E350 equipped with the 6.0L diesel engine and a 5R110W transmission. This vehicle showed up at one of our shops after a competing shop refunded the vehicle owner his money after failing several attempts to get the transmission to operate correctly.  The original problem was unknown, but the van showed up at our shop in failsafe mode with burnt fluid and several codes. The transmission had failed and slipped badly in fifth gear, usually attributed to a common direct clutch failure. The van had gear ratio codes, an over-temperature code and a couple of electrical codes, one of them being a P0768 (direct clutch solenoid SSPCD). The description of this code is as follows: “Circuit failed to provide voltage drop across solenoid. Circuit failure or PCM driver failure.”

The transmission needed a replacement, so we ordered a remanufactured transmission from our reman center and installed it into the van. Right out of the bay, the CEL light came on for a P0768 code, as I expected. I’d hoped that cleaning the case connector and applying dielectric grease during the transmission installation would clear up the code. That was not the case, so now I had some digging to do.   

12V power to the solenoids comes from the PCM and the PCM controls the ground side, so it’s easy to check both sides of the circuit live at the PCM. I back probed pin 32 at the PCM and connected the scope to monitor the circuit activity, and surprisingly, the pattern looked pretty good. I had battery voltage on the high side, and when pulling it close to ground, about .2V (See Figure 1, above).

The code hadn’t reset yet, so I took the van for a road test, and everything was working well. Fifth gear was functional again, shifts felt good and no codes were setting. I was unsure why it was working properly at this point since I hadn’t really fixed anything yet, but I was just trying to get it to act up again. 

After a few road tests I unhooked my test equipment and sent my protégé out for another test drive. He came back after about ten minutes of driving and said that the light came back on and the transmission again went into failsafe mode. I hooked up the test equipment again and once again the circuit pattern looked normal, and the transmission functioned normally. I was scratching my head at this point, because the only thing I was doing was back probing wires at the PCM for testing. Oh, wait a minute here…ding, ding, ding!

I learned long ago to use the smallest conductor you can for a back probe test. I am a big fan of AESwave and I have a few of their tools, one of which is the UMicroBackProbe which is just a small needle attached to a banana plug with about six inches of wire. (See Figure 2.) 

Figure 2.

Back to my “discovery.” I removed the back probe tool and pierced the wire with a Pomona wire piercing plug, and it took less than 30 seconds before the code set. Basically, the PCM was not pulling it to ground because the female terminal in the PCM connector was so spread out that it could not make good contact with the PCM pin until I placed the back probe into the connector. After several attempts at trying to get the repair wire and terminal from the local Ford dealer, I finally got the correct one, spliced it into the circuit, and code was gone for good. 

I have heard several arguments about how to check circuits: what tool to use, back probe, pierce the wire, don’t disconnect the plug, etc. I could find reasons to agree or disagree with any of these methods. Is any one way correct for every application? In my opinion, no. It depends on what conditions and circumstances we run into on a case-by-case basis. It also depends on what test equipment you are comfortable with and know how to use properly. 

My second case study is about a 2012 Nissan Murano 3.5L with the RE0F09B CVT. This one came in with three codes: P0845 (transmission fluid pressure sen/sw B), P0841 (transmission fluid pressure sen/sw A) and P1715 (input/primary speed sensor).

This one was straightforward. It was highly improbable that two pressure sensors and a speed sensor failed simultaneously, so whenever I see something like this, I try to find what is common for all the involved components. A review of the circuit revealed that all shared the same power wire from the TCM. Very suspect.

I disconnected the case connector and checked for 5V on the power supply circuit. It correctly measured 5V there. Shoot…I thought for sure I was going to nail this one on the first shot. I moved on to checking grounds and internal components and could not find anything wrong until I checked voltage on the control side of the pressure sensors, and it was very low. I thought about this for a moment and then grabbed my trusty pin-fit tools from Autotech Electrical. They now offer an “all makes” set that is very reasonably priced. (See Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Pin 20 on the case connector wiring was completely spread out. (See Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Trying to get a replacement pigtail or just a wire from Nissan is next to impossible, but I did find a core at our Core and Teardown facility that had a connector still attached. Sometimes it is handy having thousands of cores available for me to pick stuff from when needed. After splicing the new wire and terminal into the circuit, all was well with this CVT again.

Pin-fit has always been a diagnostic challenge, but for some reason it seems to be getting worse for us in the transmission industry. I cannot say if it is because the pins are getting smaller or if sub-par materials are being used, and it is certainly affecting several makes of vehicles. We see it on domestic, Asian, and European vehicles alike. Having the proper tools to determine if a particular terminal is the cause is the key to success here.

Figure 5 shows another set of tools that I believe is crucial to electrical testing, again from AESwave: the Utest Advanced Terminal Test Kit.

Figure 5.

I can’t tell you how many times I have asked a tech, “Is the connector ok?” and I get a “Yup, looks ok” response. Usually a pin-fit issue cannot be seen with a quick visual inspection; you must have tools to check it, and jamming a paperclip into the terminal is not the way to test it. Sometimes that can cause damage where the proper purpose-built probes aim to protect the integrity of the circuit.

Read more stories in our R&R Tech series here.

Chris Adams started with Certified Transmission in 1986 as an R&R technician, and currently works as a diagnostic lead and trainer. His current duties involve training and advising Certified’s retail diagnosticians, as well as assisting in the research and development of their remanufactured products. He is also holds ASE Master and L1 certifications.

You May Also Like

GM 6T70/75 slips and delays in first

A 2015 Chevrolet Equinox equipped with the 3.6-liter engine and 6T75 transmission has complaints of a delayed engagement into drive and slips in first gear.


The complaint

A 2015 Chevrolet Equinox equipped with the 3.6-liter engine and GM 6T75 transmission has complaints of a delayed engagement into drive and slips in first gear.

The cause

A generation one 1-2-3-4 Clutch Apply Piston was installed into a generation two transmission. The generation two 1-2-3-4 Clutch Apply Piston apply fingers are .147 in. taller than the generation one piston. This created too much clutch clearance for the clutch pack to effectively hold.

Sonnax introduces Sure Cure Kit for GM 6L80, 6L90

Sonnax has introduced a Sure Cure kit for rebuilders of GM 6L80/6L90 transmissions. The company says this kit can restore shift quality and repair common TCC trouble areas, offering products to help rebuilders repair worn areas and protect the transmission against future damage. The kit is part no. SC-6L80-6L90. Related Articles – Raybestos introduces 10R80

The importance of the follow-up road test after transmission replacement

A 2002 Lexus RX300 equipped with a 3.0-liter V6 engine and U140F transmission was brought into our facility with a few concerns. The customer said that “it has a leak, a grinding noise when taking off from a stop, and it just doesn’t seem to shift right.” Related Articles – How to fix GM 6T70/Ford

RR Tech Feature Oct
Watch: Replacing a transmission and components

Dave Hritsko and the team have already removed a full transmission in a previous video. This time, see an in-depth explanation of the parts, components, and steps in how they make the upgrade with a remanufactured transmission along with new aftermarket components with the help of students from Ohio Technical College. Related Articles – Road

Watch: How to remove a transmission

Watch Dave Hritsko from Transtar and team members from Ohio Technical College as they remove an old transmission and replace it with a newly remanufactured transmission. Related Articles – Watch: CVT fluid diagnostics – Watch: CVT electric and communication codes – Road to AAPEX Ep. 8: Paving the way for automotive innovation

Other Posts

Are you down with CVT?

The continuously variable transmission has its critics, but it’s probably here to stay.

CVT generic
ETE Reman: Ever expanding

With a history and reputation dating back to the 1980s, growth is a continuous pattern at Milwaukee’s ETE Reman. CEO Noah Rickun says that ETE is ready to meet the ever-expanding demand for remanufactured transmissions. He points to a combination of available capital to invest in the facilities, equipment, technical capabilities, and the well-trained workforce

Shift Pointers: Nissan’s no throttle response

Nissan vehicles using continuously variable transmissions (CVTs) are notorious for defaulting to a no throttle response when the vehicle is engaged into gear. There are several malfunctions that can cause this protective failsafe feature to be initiated. A brake switch (stop lamp switch) stuck on, a double-footed driver, blown or incorrect brake bulbs, and wheel

Watch: CVT diagnostic strategy and codes

Understand the codes you may see when working on a CVT and the tools and software needed to diagnose and fix the issues. Watch Transtar’s latest video, above, to learn more. Related Articles – Road to AAPEX Ep. 7: Connecting to future automotive technology – Road to AAPEX Ep. 6: Historic mile markers on the