Dodge Caravan’s Sensor Goes Awry - Transmission Digest

Dodge Caravan’s Sensor Goes Awry

I got a call recently from a friend of mine who runs a car shop, asking for help on a code for a cam sensor. He had changed the sensor twice and double-checked the circuitry and even replaced the crank sensor. The powertrain control module (PCM) was the next stop, and it was a rather expensive one, so he asked me to take a look at the vehicle before he got a PCM to see if I could verify his diagnosis.

Dodge Caravan’s Sensor Goes Awry

Tech to Tech

Subject: P0344 code
Vehicle Application: 2002 Dodge Caravan
Essential Reading: Diagnostician
Author: Jeff Bach

Slight difference in parts makes for a big challenge

Tech to Tech

  • Subject: P0344 code
  • Vehicle Application: 2002 Dodge Caravan
  • Essential Reading: Diagnostician
  • Author: Jeff Bach

Slight difference in parts makes for a big challenge

I got a call recently from a friend of mine who runs a car shop, asking for help on a code for a cam sensor.

He had changed the sensor twice and double-checked the circuitry and even replaced the crank sensor. The powertrain control module (PCM) was the next stop, and it was a rather expensive one, so he asked me to take a look at the vehicle before he got a PCM to see if I could verify his diagnosis.

When I got it to the shop, I checked the codes and got the cam-sensor code immediately as a hard code. I figured I was lucky. A lot of the vehicles I get are intermittent problems that have been around the horn and given up on.

This looked like a fairly simple, straightforward trouble-code chart if you have a lab scope and a DRB 3.

The vehicle was a 2002 Dodge Caravan with a P0344 code.

The factory manual has you checking the wiring for shorts to ground and shorts to voltage, the terminals of the connector, the reference voltage and the tone wheel/ pulse ring, and even lab-scoping the signal for intermittent glitches or dropouts.

I took a look at the iATN fix database to see if there were any common issues with this code. There were a lot of instances of it setting with this particular 2.4 engine. The fixes were a wide range from melted wiring to oil in the connector, cracked flywheel, magnets shifted or cracked on the camshaft. Many said to replace both sensors and use OEM sensors only. Timing off a tooth was also mentioned a time or two.

I figured it was time to get a look at the actual signal so I grabbed my scope and got the image in Figure 1.

It looked like a pretty clean straight five-volt Hall-effect square-wave with no glitches, but it set the code every time as soon as the engine got past cranking speed. The sensor was an aftermarket unit, but I couldn’t see anything in it that the PCM shouldn’t like.

I called my friend and asked him if he had checked the timing marks, and he assured me that they were checked and double checked. I felt the cam magnet, and it was OK. I tested the circuits pertaining to the sensor’s reference, signal and ground. They all checked out.

After reading many posts saying to use only OEM sensors, I decided to order a new one from the dealer to see if possibly there could be an issue with the signal that I wasn’t seeing.

I installed the new sensor and cleared the code and started the vehicle. The light stayed off and didn’t reset the code.

I got the image in Figure 2 from the new sensor.

Now I was confused. The signal looked identical to that of the aftermarket sensor. Same five volts, same square wave.

I started thinking maybe the problem was intermittent and was just not showing up now. I went ahead and reinstalled the other sensor to be sure, and the code came right back.

I thought I should get a look at the crank-sensor signal, since I had what looked like a flawless cam-position (CMP) signal, but as soon as the vehicle started with the aftermarket sensor, the light came on and set the P0344.

I wanted to know how the PCM could tell the difference between the two, so I thought possibly it wasn’t looking at the CMP waveform but maybe the relationship to the CKP sensor.

I hooked the other channel of the scope to the crankshaft-position (CKP) signal and got the comparison in Figure 3 while I still had the aftermarket CMP sensor in it.

Still not seeing a problem with this signal, I looked at it several times trying to catch a shift in the relationship or a glitch, but it stayed rock steady. I settled on the image in Figure 4 as the mark for No. 1 cylinder. It seems pretty far back from the CKP signal compared to other vehicles I’ve seen. Usually some part of the CMP signal is in the wide gap on the CKP signal.

Next, I put the OEM sensor in and compared the signals again in Figure 5.

I saw the same square wave from both sensors, but looking closely I saw that the dealer CMP sensor goes up the second tooth back from the CKP-sensor gap. The other CMP sensor goes up on the third tooth back from the CKP-sensor gap (Figure 6).

The description for setting the code says that it sets when the camshaft-sensor signal is intermittent. The timing of the signals is not listed as a possible cause. Clearly, though, the timing of the signal is critical and can set the code in one trip and even during cranking.

Now the whole thing made sense. The aftermarket sensor appears to be manufactured with the trigger clocked one tooth off from the factory sensor.

I can see where this is causing lots of problems for technicians trying to work on these vehicles. With this code setting from such a small difference in signals, I’m sure it sets with the least bit of timing-belt stretch. I can see a vehicle coming in with this code and getting a new sensor according to the trouble-code chart. When that doesn’t solve the problem and nothing else checks bad, a technician looks at the timing-belt alignment and sees that the marks show some stretch, then maybe changes the timing belt and still can’t get rid of the code because of the difference in the offset from the aftermarket sensor, and then the chase is on.

When I told the technician who sent me the vehicle what the problem was, he was relieved that it wasn’t easy to find the problem and wasn’t happy with the parts supplier who sent him the problem part. I gave him copies of the images that show the timing problem, and he is hoping to get some help from the supplier on the labor.

I’m hoping the right people get the message about the problem with the part and they get it straightened out before too many more technicians get into trouble trying to diagnose this code.

Of course, if they don’t, it won’t be as much fun figuring out the next one.

Jeff Bach is the owner of CRT Auto Electronics in Batavia, Ohio. You can reach him at [email protected].

This copyrighted article is reprinted with the permission of AutoInc., the official publication of the Automotive Service Association (ASA). To learn more about ASA and its commitment to independent automotive-service and repair professionals, visit www.ASAshop.org or call 800-272-7467.

You May Also Like

Ford 8F35 maintenance tips: Planetary failure and no-pressure conditions

Our shop has had several vehicles come in with the Ford 8F35 transmission having planetary failure. Apparently, there was a run where the pinion needle bearings had a hardness problem (see Figure 1). Ford has a bulletin out (bulletin number 22-281), which provides a part number for this planetary assembly: the part number is JM5Z-7N473-C and

Figure 12.

Our shop has had several vehicles come in with the Ford 8F35 transmission having planetary failure. Apparently, there was a run where the pinion needle bearings had a hardness problem (see Figure 1).

Ford has a bulletin out (bulletin number 22-281), which provides a part number for this planetary assembly: the part number is JM5Z-7N473-C and costs about $160.

Don’t fear customer complaints about CVTs

Continuously Variable Transmissions, or CVTs, are more common than you think. Audi, Subaru, Nissan, Ford, GM and many other automakers use CVT transmissions in cars and SUVs. There is no way to avoid them. Chances are there is one in your shop right now. Related Articles – Back with force: ATSG is back in full

CVT-Transmission-2
Shift Pointers: A Chrysler 300 no-shift complaint

The case study has to do with a 2009 Chrysler 300 C 5.7L Nag1 RWD with 71,923 miles on it (see Figure 1, above). Related Articles – A guide to common GM, Ford and Nissan programming issues – Shift of the shaft: Diagnosing Chrysler 48RE manual shaft issues – Sometimes, a diagnostic code is all

A guide to common GM, Ford and Nissan programming issues

One of the most common complaints I hear from shops when trying to install a new GM TCM is, “The module will not communicate.” While that might be partially true, by design they won’t communicate until they are programmed. If programming fails, there will be an “E” code set which will help you get to

Shift of the shaft: Diagnosing Chrysler 48RE manual shaft issues

The TorqueFlite transmission has been around since mid-to-late 1950s. There have been many changes surrounding the manual shaft and rooster comb through the years. This transmission shaft controls the position of the manual valve that directs oil for the gear ranges, but it also is used for a Reverse light control as well as Park/Neutral

Other Posts

Jatco JF613E transmission quick reference material

For those working on the Jatco JR613E transmission, a widespread transmission with plenty of applications, the following should be a helpful guide. Related Articles – Complete the 2024 transmission shop survey for a chance to win a gift card – Think pink: Curtis Price strikes out on his own and has Liberty Transmission and Auto

Easy TH400, 4L80-E reverse servo setup: Craft your own tool

While not as sensitive as some shifting bands, the Reverse band adjustment on a TH400 or 4L80-E transmission is critical, and failure to get it right has tripped up even the best builders. There is nothing worse than getting the transmission installed, putting it in Reverse and then not going anywhere or having no engine

Spotting different 68RFE designs through the years to avoid issues

The Chrysler 68RFE has had several changes through the years. Its four-speed predecessor began with a noisy solenoid pack identified by a black colored pass-through case connector (seen in Figure 1).  Related Articles – Shift Pointers: Failures caused by incorrect tire sizes – Understanding lube flow control valves in Toyota/Lexus UA/UB80 transmissions – How reading

Shift Pointers: Failures caused by incorrect tire sizes

For years ATSG has produced a wide range of issues related to improper tire sizes on vehicles. Even under-inflated tires have been known to cause issues. Problems such as premature failure with an active 4WD transfer case will occur with incorrect tire sizes. Related Articles – Sometimes, you should sweat the small stuff – Fabricating

Shift-Pointers-Jan-Figure-1-1400