Troubled Continental Running ‘Rich’ - Transmission Digest

Troubled Continental Running ‘Rich’

The complaint on the car was that it ran terribly rich and the fuel mileage had gone down to about 8 mpg. The car had been to two independent shops and, last, at the Ford dealer. It had had both O2 sensors replaced and two electronic control units (ECUs) installed. The dealer told the owner that the car was getting as good a gas mileage as it was going to get. They had installed a new ECU because they said the one that was in it was an aftermarket part and wouldn’t work properly. The car was not setting any codes, but the sooty exhaust made it obvious that it was running pig rich. A scan check revealed that the engine was reaching operating temperature, the manifold-air-pressure (MAP) sensor was working, the engine was in closed loop, and the O2 readings were showing lean. I got the image in Figure 1 by connecting one channel of my scope to one of the O2 sensors and the other channel to the injector signal at the ECU.

Troubled Continental Running ‘Rich’

Tech to Tech

Subject: Engine running rich, poor fuel mileage
Vehicle Application: 1990 Lincoln Continental
Essential Reading: Diagnostician
Author: Jeff Bach

Troubleshooting a ’90 Lincoln requires pulling out the big ‘guns’

Tech to Tech

  • Subject: Engine running rich, poor fuel mileage
  • Vehicle Application: 1990 Lincoln Continental
  • Essential Reading: Diagnostician
  • Author: Jeff Bach

Troubleshooting a ’90 Lincoln requires pulling out the big ‘guns’

“Would you like to try your luck at fixing my car? I’m told you like the hard ones.”

This challenge came from the owner of a clean, old 1990 Lincoln Continental.

The owner was an older fellow who purchased the car new. He had a history book that told of the places the car had been, all the repairs ever done and the parts that had been replaced. He wanted me to be clear on everything that had already been tried and all the parts he had paid for so that I wouldn’t be duplicating anything. He had also informed me that he was not willing to pay for any more guessing. When he finished explaining his rules, he had one question:

“Still think you’re interested?”

I began to explain to him that I had a few rules of my own.

“No. 1, I don’t guess; No. 2, I don’t do free diagnosis; No. 3, I can’t give you a final estimate until I spend some time figuring out the problem and make a determination.

“I have my own way of diagnosing problems, and I don’t start by eliminating testing that someone else has done. I treat the car as though I just got it fresh. I don’t know the people who did the testing, and I can’t account for the quality of the parts they used. I will figure out the problem for you if you allow me to work my way.

“Still want me to work on it?”

“If you’re sure you can figure it out, have at it,” he said.

He left the car with me and went home to wait for a phone call. He told me he was retired and could come back as soon as I knew something.

The complaint on the car was that it ran terribly rich and the fuel mileage had gone down to about 8 mpg. The car had been to two independent shops and, last, at the Ford dealer. It had had both O2 sensors replaced and two electronic control units (ECUs) installed. The dealer told the owner that the car was getting as good a gas mileage as it was going to get. They had installed a new ECU because they said the one that was in it was an aftermarket part and wouldn’t work properly. The car was not setting any codes, but the sooty exhaust made it obvious that it was running pig rich. A scan check revealed that the engine was reaching operating temperature, the manifold-air-pressure (MAP) sensor was working, the engine was in closed loop, and the O2 readings were showing lean. I got the image in Figure 1 by connecting one channel of my scope to one of the O2 sensors and the other channel to the injector signal at the ECU.

The O2 sensor at more than 3.5 volts stood out as a jumping-off point to begin testing, especially with the scan tool showing 0.01 volt. I pulled the connector cover off the ECU to access the wire terminals and printed a pin-out chart. Comparing my readings, I found all to be within the normal range except for the O2 signal.

I suspected there was an external voltage source shorted to the O2-sensor circuit, so I disconnected the ECU connector and the front O2 sensor and measured resistance of the O2 circuit to all the voltage sources with the battery disconnected and the key on. Nothing showed continuity. I surmised there could be an internal problem with the ECU, but what were the odds of having that problem on three of them?

The thought occurred to me that there could be a solenoid or relay shorted that was taking out the ECU ground circuit as fast as they were being plugged in. This wouldn’t be the first one of those I’ve run into. I did a pin-out resistance check on every ECU-controlled circuit and came up empty again. I pulled the ECU and gave it a “smell check,” which it passed. I began to see where this problem could have earned its place as one of those stumpers that stick in the mind of all those who’ve crossed its path.

I figured it was time to break out the “breakout box” and do some in situ pin-out testing. I noticed while testing the O2 signals this time that the O2-sensor ground – which I hadn’t realized before was separate from the ECU heavy-gauge black/green grounds – was orange and of a light-gauge wire. The pin for the ground on the breakout box was showing the same voltage as the O2-signal wire while the orange wire at the ECU connector was showing 0 volt.

I ran an external ground to the pin on the box, and the car started to smooth out. I saved the scope readings from the injector and O2 sensor. Their signals are shown in Figure 2.

It’s amazing to me how watching a waveform on my scope can make me feel like my whole body is smiling.

I switched the time base on the scope to see the O2-sensor frequency and got Figure 3 on my scope.

The O2 frequency was good, and the longer it ran the deeper the voltage swings were getting. I figured it would take a little while to burn the soot off of it.

I rechecked the resistance reading at the ECU plug and figured out that the wire was not making good contact with the pin right at the connector. Once I repaired the terminal I retested the signals and saved the readings of my “before and after” to show the owner (Figure 4).

I contacted the owner and related the results of my testing and recommended an oil change, and another new set of plugs. He was so skeptical that I had found the problem that he wanted to come down to the shop to see what I was telling him so he could better understand I was sure that this would fix his problem.

When he got here, I explained to him that the odd nature of the problem he had could account for the difficulty in diagnosis that he had encountered. I told him that I had to pull out the big guns to find it. I then showed him the scope readings I got in progression and explained what they meant.

I saved the before-and-after shot ’til last. He left grinning like a Grinch and gave me the OK for the other work.

When he came to pick up the car, I went with him on a short test drive so that he could watch his fuel-mileage numbers climb. I could feel him smiling as he asked for copies of the scope readings.

I like to think they made for a happy end to this chapter of his Lincoln history book.

Jeff Bach is the owner of CRT Auto Electronics, an ASA-member shop in Batavia, Ohio. For more information on this topic, contact Bach at (515) 732-3965. His e-mail address is [email protected] and his website is www.currentprobe.com.

This copyrighted article is reprinted with the permission of AutoInc., the official publication of the Automotive Service Association (ASA). To learn more about ASA and its commitment to independent automotive-service and repair professionals, visit www.ASAshop.org or call 800-272-7467.

You May Also Like

A guide to common GM, Ford and Nissan programming issues

One of the most common complaints I hear from shops when trying to install a new GM TCM is, “The module will not communicate.” While that might be partially true, by design they won’t communicate until they are programmed. If programming fails, there will be an “E” code set which will help you get to

One of the most common complaints I hear from shops when trying to install a new GM TCM is, “The module will not communicate.” While that might be partially true, by design they won’t communicate until they are programmed. If programming fails, there will be an “E” code set which will help you get to the root of your problem.

Shift of the shaft: Diagnosing Chrysler 48RE manual shaft issues

The TorqueFlite transmission has been around since mid-to-late 1950s. There have been many changes surrounding the manual shaft and rooster comb through the years. This transmission shaft controls the position of the manual valve that directs oil for the gear ranges, but it also is used for a Reverse light control as well as Park/Neutral

Sometimes, a diagnostic code is all you need

With ATSG having the opportunity to help shops solve problems, sometimes we get faced with some real doozies. A shop will call and give us a laundry list of DTCs, leaving us to think someone must have a bulkhead connector unplugged. We then go through the arduous task of deciding which codes prompted other codes

10L80 and 10R80 pump gear differences

You may have seen an article in the August 2023 issue of Transmission Digest called “GM 10L80: A new kind of pump noise,” which goes over how the front cover housing in the 10L80 is fitted with a converter drive gear and idler gear. The idler gear drives the pump’s driven gear, and is press

Shift Pointers: What to do when the 62TE TRS tab breaks

How frustrating it is when on a hot summer day, as you go to open a nice cold can of your drink of choice, and the tab breaks off? You are outside, away from any tools to remedy the problem quickly. It now requires a MacGyver mentality looking around at the resources available to get

Other Posts

Easy TH400, 4L80-E reverse servo setup: Craft your own tool

While not as sensitive as some shifting bands, the Reverse band adjustment on a TH400 or 4L80-E transmission is critical, and failure to get it right has tripped up even the best builders. There is nothing worse than getting the transmission installed, putting it in Reverse and then not going anywhere or having no engine

Spotting different 68RFE designs through the years to avoid issues

The Chrysler 68RFE has had several changes through the years. Its four-speed predecessor began with a noisy solenoid pack identified by a black colored pass-through case connector (seen in Figure 1).  Related Articles – Shift Pointers: Failures caused by incorrect tire sizes – Understanding lube flow control valves in Toyota/Lexus UA/UB80 transmissions – How reading

Shift Pointers: Failures caused by incorrect tire sizes

For years ATSG has produced a wide range of issues related to improper tire sizes on vehicles. Even under-inflated tires have been known to cause issues. Problems such as premature failure with an active 4WD transfer case will occur with incorrect tire sizes. Related Articles – Sometimes, you should sweat the small stuff – Fabricating

Shift-Pointers-Jan-Figure-1-1400
Understanding lube flow control valves in Toyota/Lexus UA/UB80 transmissions

The Toyota/Lexus UA80 and UB80 transmissions first came out in 2017 in Highlanders and Siennas. The UA80 is used in V6 applications, and the UB80 is paired with four-cylinder versions. They have been called Toyota New Global Architecture type transmissions, and alternately referred to as the “Direct Shift 8AT” eight-speed automatic transmission. This transmission was

Tasc-Tip-December-Figure-1---LFC-Valve-OE-Partial-Circuit-Diagram-1400