What IS the Correct Name? - Transmission Digest

What IS the Correct Name?

When you are ordering torque-converter parts from your supplier, it is important to be able to communicate your wants and needs to your salesperson. Frustrations run high on both sides when the purchaser asks for and receives a clutch when his intention was to buy a friction ring.

What IS the Correct Name?

Torque Converter Tech Tips

Author: Ed Lee

Torque Converter Tech Tips

  • Author: Ed Lee

When you are ordering torque-converter parts from your supplier, it is important to be able to communicate your wants and needs to your salesperson. Frustrations run high on both sides when the purchaser asks for and receives a clutch when his intention was to buy a friction ring.

The frustration level increases when the purchaser realizes that he/she has bought a $30 part when his/her intention was to buy a $3 part. Ordering large quantities of the wrong part is even worse. If the purchaser and parts supplier refer to a given part by the same name, there is no problem. Unfortunately, you can visit most converter shops and hear three or four people use different names for the same part. For this reason, some purchasers will order parts only by the part number. These communication problems are not limited to purchasers and parts suppliers; they exist between shops and even between individuals within the same shop.

So, how do we learn to speak the same language? How do we know what name to call a part? Looking back to the origin of the automatic transmission may help us understand where the confusion began. Many of the names used for the parts of the torque converter today were derived from its predecessor.

The earliest automatic transmissions did not use a torque converter to transmit engine torque to the input shaft of the transmission. Instead, they used a fluid coupling. The fluid coupling looked something like a torque converter but lacked a stator.

Some manufacturers called the fluid coupling a torus assembly. The torus assembly consisted of a drive and driven torus, a flywheel and a torus cover. The flywheel was attached to the engine’s crankshaft, and the empty shell or cover (no blades or vanes) was attached to the flywheel. This shell drove the drive torus. As the assembly rotated, oil was forced to the outer diameter of the drive torus and into the driven torus.

The driven torus was attached to the input shaft of the transmission and transferred some portion of the engine’s torque to the transmission. The fluid coupling never attained high efficiency, because the oil that exited the driven torus struck the drive torus in the opposite direction of its rotation, which effectively worked against the engine.

To correct this deficiency, a stator was placed between the drive and driven members of the fluid coupling. The stator redirected the oil that was exiting the driven member so that it now struck the drive member in the direction of its rotation, working to assist the engine. The addition of the stator to the fluid coupling began the evolution from fluid coupling to the torque converter.

During this evolution, several other changes occurred. The blades from the drive torus were moved to the inside of the empty shell that was attached to the flywheel, and this part became the new driving member. The original-equipment manufacturers (OEMs) of the day could not agree on what to call this part. General Motors started out calling this part the primary pump (Figure 1). Today it is just called the pump assembly.

Chrysler called this part the impeller, and that name is still used today. Ford called this part the impeller (pump) (Figure 2) and calls it the impeller assembly today.

The overseas manufacturer of the day, Toyota, called this part the pump impeller (Figure 3).

The terms used for the torque converter’s driven member did not have as much diversification. The input-shaft drive flange became known as the turbine hub. When the hub was coupled to the turbine, it was called the turbine assembly. The term turbine assembly was used by all the early OEMs except Toyota, which referred to it as the turbine runner (Figure 3).

The stator also has been called by many names. The illustration in the 1950 Chevrolet Shop Manual (Figure 1) referred to the stator as the secondary pump. The mid-’50s Packard Ultradrive’s crude stator was referred to as the reactor assembly. Today most OEMs use the term stator assembly, although Ford now uses the term reactor assembly.

The front of the fluid coupling was also the engine’s flywheel, and it retained the flywheel name. When the fluid coupling became the torque converter, the engine’s flywheel also was used as the front component of many early bolt-together units. Buick Dyna-flow, Chevrolet and Chrysler all used this construction. The difference was that the term cover was now being used for the flywheel when it became part of the torque-converter housing. The OEMs probably adopted the term cover because of the manner used to build their converters. Most OEM procedures started with the impeller and stacked the other components onto the impeller. The front cover was the last component to be added, thus covering the assembly. To this day, the term “cover” is the most-universally used term associated with the torque converter.

Figure 4 shows the correct and incorrect names used for the main components of a torque converter.

Next month: the correct names for the components of the impeller, turbine, stator and converter-clutch assemblies.

Ed Lee is a Sonnax Technical Specialist who writes on issues of interest to torque-converter rebuilders.

Sonnax supports the Torque Converter Rebuilders Association. Learn more about the group at www.tcraonline.com.

You May Also Like

Sherlock Holmes Approach to an AB60 No-Move Situation

The effectiveness in diagnosing automatic transmission malfunctions is an art form. Although there are similarities among the wide varieties of transmissions on the road, each transmission has its own peculiarities. Aside from having mechanical, hydraulic, and electrical hardware systems to contend with, software/programming issues and various vehicle platforms make diagnostics much more difficult.  Using scopes provides

ab60

The effectiveness in diagnosing automatic transmission malfunctions is an art form. Although there are similarities among the wide varieties of transmissions on the road, each transmission has its own peculiarities. Aside from having mechanical, hydraulic, and electrical hardware systems to contend with, software/programming issues and various vehicle platforms make diagnostics much more difficult. 

GM 6T40 Pump Identification Guide

The 6T40 was introduced in 2008 for General Motors front-wheel-drive cars in the Chevrolet Malibu and has gone through several changes throughout its three generations, specifically in the pump area. The 6T40 is closely related to the more lightweight 6T30 and the heavier duty 6T45 and 6T50. Generation one started phasing out during the 2012

Seeing the Forest AND the Trees

They say that the proverbial phrase “I couldn’t see the forest for the trees” means that a person or organization cannot see the big picture because it focuses too much on the details. Related Articles – 4L60E Harsh 1-2 Shift – TASC Force Tips: Diagnosing 8L45 & 8L90 Shift Complaints – TASC Force Tips: Hydraulics

The Manifold Pipeway

The Honda six-speed transmission has been on the bench of many specialty shops for one reason or another (figure 1). But, for those of you who have yet to lay your hands on one, mounted on the upper side of the unit is one of the largest, if not the largest solenoid and pressure switch

8L90 Vacuum Testing

Below are the diagrams for vacuum testing GM 8L90 transmissions. Note: OE valves are shown in rest position and should be tested in rest position unless otherwise indicated. Test locations are pointed to with an arrow. Springs are not shown for visual clarity. A low vacuum reading indicates wear. For specific vacuum test information, refer

Other Posts

Critical Wear Areas & Vacuum Test Locations for FORD 6R80/6R100

Note: OE valves are shown in rest position and should be tested in rest position unless otherwise indicated. Test locations are noted with an arrow. Springs are not shown for visual clarity. Low vacuum reading indicates wear. For specific vacuum test information, visit www.sonnax.com. Related Articles – Hydraulics Fundamentals: Shift & Relay Valves – Another

Hydraulics Fundamentals: Shift & Relay Valves

Shift valves and relay valves share a lot of the same duties. This article is one of a series by Sonnax exploring how valves and hydraulic circuits work and what results when they quit functioning correctly.

Another 62TE ‘No-Move’ Possibility

Most seasoned techs have several quick diagnostic steps they take when faced with a transmission malfunction. The type of problem and transmission determines which steps to take. For example, a “no-move” condition. Related Articles – A guide to common GM, Ford and Nissan programming issues – Shift of the shaft: Diagnosing Chrysler 48RE manual shaft

Hydraulics Fundamentals: Clutch Regulator Valves

Knowing how these circuits work and the slightly different variations that the manufacturers utilize should pinpoint any valve body-related issues