Snowplow Diagnostics - Transmission Digest

Snowplow Diagnostics

Mike Greer breaks down an AS68RC, bearing a snowplow, with diagnostic issues.

A 2009 Ram 4500 was towed to the shop. This truck had the 6.7 turbo diesel equipped with our remanufactured AS68RC transmission. This vehicle was also equipped with a snowplow, salt spreader, performance tuner, and several communication radios. The vehicle ha a multitude of issues with diagnostic trouble codes stored in several different modules. After gathering the trouble codes, a road test was in order. I connected the scan tool and proceeded to drive the truck. Initially the transmission would not shift, and I noticed there was no input speed signal registering in the PID data. This coincided with the P0717 (no signal input speed sensor 1) code pulled. A trouble code P0560 (battery system voltage) was also stored along with a P2121 (accelerator pedal position sensor 1 performance). I quickly looked at the APP sensor and the scanner data PIDs confirmed that it was working at the present time, so I decided to address that issue after I addressed the transmission issues.

We investigated the P0560 code first. The theory of operation for this code is: “Battery voltage is supplied to the controller and is used to write to the controller EEPROM after vehicle shutdown (similar to Keep Alive Memory).” That seemed like a mouthful. We pulled a wiring diagram and discovered that B+ to the control module comes from the TIPM (Totally Integrated Power Module), fuse #4. Fuse #4 supplies B+ to the TCM (Transmission Control Module) at C2, pin 7. The easiest place to start is checking the fuse since the TCM is under the dash. Once the cover was off and the fuses visible, we saw that fuse #4 was missing. (Figure 1) We were unable to determine why someone had removed the fuse. Kevin replaced the fuse, cleared the codes and then scanned the codes once more. The P0560 was now cleared and did not return. It was time to move on to the next issue…

Figure 1

Now we were going to address the ISS (Input Speed Sensor) code. We still had no speed signal on the scan tool with the engine running. This speed sensor is easily accessible, so we decided to check it while it was still in the transmission. We noticed that the sensor connector was not securely fastened. He inspected the connector and the sensor pins and then secured the plug. This did not fix our issue. We then disconnected the sensor and tested the resistance of the speed sensor itself. The sensor in the transmission tested “OPEN” so we decided to replace the sensor. It was a difficult part to source. They were backordered from the O.E. but we were able to locate one.

The sensor came in a few days later and we installed it. To our dismay, there was still no speed signal on the scan tool. We tested the new sensor and it was good. We were missing something; could there possibly be issues with all of the added aftermarket components? Could the tuner have some effect on the sensor operation?

I had some idea of the direction I would need to go, but I had not worked on this system in the past. It was similar to others, but still different. This vehicle has an AS68RC transmission. This system uses a separate TCM that is located under the dash. This TCM had been replaced prior to coming in to us. All of the B+ and grounds were double checked, and the calibrations correct to the VIN were confirmed. We knew it had been replaced and confirmed that the install was correctly done. I printed out all of the relevant information I could get, including theory of operation, wiring diagrams, and pertinent specifications that were available.

These speed sensors are 8-volt magneto-resistive sensors that generate a square wave signal. It measures the speed of the P1 sun gear which is attached to the input shaft. What was confusing was that the first wiring diagram I looked at, C2 pin 1 at the TCM did not state an 8-volt supply.

In fact, C2 pin 1 was labeled as “speed sensor ground” on this document. That didn’t make any sense. As I looked further and I found a different diagram that was labeled correctly. Now that I had good information and a plan of attack, I started my search for the problem. (Figure 2)

Figure 2

I sensed that I was not having an issue with the 8-volt supply since we were not having any issues with the OSS (Output Speed Sensor), because both sensors get the 8 volts from the same source, C2 pin 1. Regardless, I thought I’d better check it in case there was an issue with the splice S021.

I tested and saw 8 volts at pin 2 of the ISS. I decided to scope the sensor at the speed sensor itself. I was able to get a pattern but there still was no signal shown on the scan tool. The pattern looked odd to me. The amplitude was very low, and I thought there must be something limiting it and perhaps why the TCM couldn’t register a signal. (Figure 3) I would later determine that I was wrong and started to head down the wrong path for a short period of time.

Figure 3

I thought that since the supply voltage was 8 volts, I should at least see 0-8-volt amplitude, or something close to that. In my basic thinking, if you are going to supply 8 volts you should USE 8 volts. Since most of the O.E.M.’s don’t publish their wave form specifications, I was not sure what I was working with or where to find it. So, I went back to double-check all my readings at the TCM. I rechecked all the voltages and grounds. Again, everything checked out. There had to be an issue with the TCM. The original TCM was in the vehicle so I swapped it back in and rechecked. No change in the results.

Racking my brain as to where I would find the crucial waveform information I needed, I looked through the PICO waveform library, and found nothing. I Googled it, and still found nothing. Out of the blue it occurred to me that I hadn’t checked the “Guided Component Test” on the Snap-On scanner. The specs I needed were found there! (Figure 4)

Figure 4

Per this information, the sensor should read .8V to 1.6V. That was precisely what my sensor was generating. Success! Not so fast, though. Why did I not have a PID reading on the scan tool?

I decided to attach my scope leads to the TCM. I back probed C1 pin 1, and C2 pin 1. With the engine idling there was no pattern shown on my scope. That’s a problem. Now I needed to figure out where the cause was. I knew it wasn’t the 8-Volt supply, because I had 8-volts at both of the speed sensors. I suspected an open circuit in the ISS wires (DG/OG). I started by working my way towards the transmission from the TCM. There is a bulkhead connector just above the master cylinder. (Figure 5)

Figure 5

I checked the TCM side of this connector, and still no signal. It was virtually impossible to back probe the back side, so I took the connector apart and checked the pin fit and made sure I had no damaged pins. I cleaned the connector and reassembled it, making sure the bolt that held the halves together was tight. I started the vehicle again and now had a good pattern and signal on the scan tool.

It seemed to be either a poor connection or the bulkhead connector bolt was not tight enough. It seems that lately connection issues are the source of many a headache. I drove the vehicle and the transmission worked well. I got a good recording of the ISS and OSS patterns for future reference. (Figure 3)

No codes returned. I was happy but something about this was bugging me. When I got back from the road test I hooked up the scan tool, homed in on the ISS PID and watched as I loosened the bulkhead connector bolt. Nothing happened at first, but when I pulled on the connector a slight tug caused the ISS to drop out. We didn’t lose any other data, just the ISS. I tried this a couple times and it was repeatable. I was now satisfied that I’d located the root cause. I tightened the bolt again, cleared the codes, and went for a drive. The ISS fault was gone and the P0560 did not return with the fuse installed.

The APP code, P2121, did not return during this visit, however, it did return a few weeks later and we replaced the APP sensor at that time.

Sometimes you think you’re on the right track only to find out you’re going down the rabbit hole. Some problems are very frustrating while you’re in the moment but, great learning experiences once you conquer them. The key is to retrace your steps, double-check, and think outside the box. Even the most difficult issues can be fixed.

Randy has worked for Certified Transmission for over twenty-five years and is an ASE Certified Master Technician, including L-1. He has been in the automotive industry for over 30 years.

You May Also Like

Dealing with the increasingly common pin-fit problem

I want to talk a little bit about a common diagnostic misstep or overlooked problem that is prevalent in the automotive repair industry and seems to be on the rise. Pin-fit or tension can deal us a fit sometimes (pun intended), especially if we do not have the proper tools to determine if this mode

RR-Tech-September-FIG-1-1400

I want to talk a little bit about a common diagnostic misstep or overlooked problem that is prevalent in the automotive repair industry and seems to be on the rise. Pin-fit or tension can deal us a fit sometimes (pun intended), especially if we do not have the proper tools to determine if this mode of failure might be the cause. I have a couple of case studies to share that I have seen recently, and will share some testing protocols that I have used over the years to attempt to correctly diagnose a related issue or a code. 

Watch: Replacing a transmission and components

Dave Hritsko and the team have already removed a full transmission in a previous video. This time, see an in-depth explanation of the parts, components, and steps in how they make the upgrade with a remanufactured transmission along with new aftermarket components with the help of students from Ohio Technical College. Related Articles – Can

Removing-a-Transmission-with-Dave-from-Transtar-1400
Watch: How to remove a transmission

Watch Dave Hritsko from Transtar and team members from Ohio Technical College as they remove an old transmission and replace it with a newly remanufactured transmission. Related Articles – Road to AAPEX season 2, ep. 9: The roads that connect us – Watch: CVT modules and programming – Watch: CVT fluid diagnostics

Back to square one: When a transmission replacement doesn’t fix the problem

The subject of this article is a 2002 Ford Ranger with a 3.0L V6 engine and 5R44E transmission. There were 191,622 miles on the vehicle when it arrived at our shop. The owner said that the transmission was not shifting correctly and the OD lamp was flashing. Related Articles – Back with force: ATSG is

RRfeature-1400
The technician’s duty to the customer

I want to talk about some of the recent trends of particular cars and trucks that we see showing up at repair shops for work to be done. It seems to be a perfect storm of high used car prices, lack of new car inventory, and a bit of economic uncertainty that brings us to

rr-feature-1400

Other Posts

Diving into electrical testing and wiring with the 948TE

We had a 2014 Jeep Cherokee come into our Bellevue, Neb. facility with a transmission that would not shift. This all-wheel drive vehicle was equipped with a 3.2L engine and a 948TE nine-speed transmission. Related Articles – Shift of the shaft: Diagnosing Chrysler 48RE manual shaft issues – Sometimes, a diagnostic code is all you

RR-Tech-June-FIG-1-1400
Potential causes of an overheated transmission: It’s not always what you think

If a transmission starts overheating, the root cause must be something to do with the transmission itself, right? Not always. The following are a few examples where the transmission was not to blame. Related Articles – Top 20 Tools and Products: The Winners – Performance supplier listings 2024 – Shift Pointers: What to do when

A mysterious shudder: Locating a problem with no fault codes

It was a dark stormy night… well, not really; it was just an ordinary Tuesday. Related Articles – Diagnosing Ford 10R60, 10R80 and 10R140 series speed sensor issues – Jatco JF613E transmission quick reference material – Complete the 2024 transmission shop survey for a chance to win a gift card On that ordinary Tuesday, a customer

RRfeature-April-23
TCM trouble and the importance of being certain about parts replacement

It’s a tale as old as time. A vehicle comes in and, despite having been recently repaired by another shop, the vehicle owner’s concern is still present. In the case of this story, the vehicle came from a local shop we work closely with. The truck in question is a 66,000-mile 2006 Chevrolet Silverado 2500

RR-Tech-March-FIG-1-1400