Analyzing Clues Solves TCC Mystery - Transmission Digest

Analyzing Clues Solves TCC Mystery

The vehicle was a 1995 Ford Ranger 2WD, equipped with a 4R44E transmission. It had originally been repaired by a local transmission shop that had removed the unit and rebuilt it in house, though we had no knowledge of what the original complaint was at the time. After their repair, it would set a P0741 (TCC stuck off), OD light flashing etc. They’d had the vehicle for quite some time but then decided to purchase a remanufactured unit from one of our distributors when repairing the rebuilt unit was unsuccessful. After installation of the remanufactured unit, the same code and symptoms returned. It was then that the vehicle was brought to our shop for diagnosis.

Analyzing Clues Solves TCC Mystery

R&R Tech

Author: Dan Frazier
Subject Matter: Diagnosis
Unit: 4R44E
Vehicle Application: 1995 Ford Ranger 2WD
Issue: TCC stuck off

R&R Tech

Author: Dan Frazier
Subject Matter: Diagnosis
Unit: 4R44E
Vehicle Application: 1995 Ford Ranger 2WD
Issue: TCC stuck off


For those of us who have spent a fair amount of time in a shop, you have to wonder whether there would ever be a time when you could say, “I’ve seen it all.” It seems that every day we run into some variation of a problem that is just unusual enough that we have to start diagnosing from a clean sheet of paper. Although this scenario involved a mechanical issue, it was, well – different. Somehow these kinds of stories often seem to involve a previous repair performed by another shop, and this story is no different.

The vehicle was a 1995 Ford Ranger 2WD, equipped with a 4R44E transmission. It had originally been repaired by a local transmission shop that had removed the unit and rebuilt it in house, though we had no knowledge of what the original complaint was at the time. After their repair, it would set a P0741 (TCC stuck off), OD light flashing etc. They’d had the vehicle for quite some time but then decided to purchase a remanufactured unit from one of our distributors when repairing the rebuilt unit was unsuccessful. After installation of the remanufactured unit, the same code and symptoms returned. It was then that the vehicle was brought to our shop for diagnosis.

After verifying the concern and pulling codes, I did some basic tests to determine whether the PCM was commanding the TCC solenoid correctly, and to make sure the TCC solenoid was functioning properly. I found no problems with the solenoid, circuit or PCM command. While watching the TCC slip in the PID data while driving, you could see the TCC start to slip, and as soon as it hit 200 rpm the OD light began to flash. With this solid information I made the determination that it had to be an internal problem with the transmission. I would later discover that I was right – well, sort of.

We ordered a replacement unit from our plant. As we were completing the unit installation, my R&R tech discovered a couple of extra washers lying on the frame rail. We looked at all the bolts and couldn’t find anything missing, so we buttoned up the vehicle and proceeded to start the engine.

Upon startup, my ears were treated to the familiar and troublesome “screech” of a starter drive still engaged. I looked up through the inspection cover and the starter drive was hitting the flex plate. That’s when the R&R technician said that, during the installation, it seemed as if the converter had to pull away from the transmission much farther than usual to mate up with the flex plate. That’s when the red flags began to show themselves. Now we had something to look at.

We pulled the starter out to make sure that the drive gear wasn’t seized or sticking, and it wasn’t. After some pondering and a closer look, we determined that the extra washers were being used as starter shims between the starter and transmission. Those of you who know Fords also know that they don’t use starter shims from the factory at all.

What we think happened was that the first R&R technician didn’t have the converter studs lined up when he mated the in-house rebuild to the engine, zipped the bellhousing bolts down with his 1/2-inch impact wrench and inadvertently bent the flex plate in. This caused the sealing ring for the TCC oil supply to barely seal on the torque converter (because the converter was being pulled an excessive distance away from the transmission), letting the TCC lose pressure. That also explained why none of the other units functioned properly, either.

We ordered a new flex plate for the vehicle, and when the new part was compared with the flexplate that we had removed from the vehicle, we found that it was almost 1/2 inch taller. After the installation was completed with the new flex plate, we performed a few road tests to ensure that the issues were completely resolved. No lights came on during the road tests, and no codes were set. The vehicle was released to a smiling customer.

We’ll never know exactly what caused the bent flex plate in the first place, as it is possible that an incorrect, used flex plate was installed because of ring-gear wear. Or the original technician simply made an installation error. Who knows? It just goes to show that anyone can make mistakes, and some of them are just harder to find than others. The phantom washers were the giveaway in our situation, but sometimes the clues aren’t so obvious. Just when you’ve thought you’ve seen it all, know that you never will, at least not in the repair business.

Dan Frazier is a diagnostician at Certified Transmission’s retail location in Grandview, Mo. An ASE certified master technician, he has been in the automotive industry more than 30 years.

You May Also Like

Mystery transmission problems: When the code doesn’t match the complaint

This one was a learning experience for me, and I hope my journey will help others if they run into this same scenario. A 2012 Nissan Quest with a 3.5L engine and the RE0F09B transmission came into our shop with the complaint that the CEL was on, there was a loss of power and the

RR-Tech-July

This one was a learning experience for me, and I hope my journey will help others if they run into this same scenario. A 2012 Nissan Quest with a 3.5L engine and the RE0F09B transmission came into our shop with the complaint that the CEL was on, there was a loss of power and the vehicle would not accelerate. After turning the vehicle off for a while, the concern had corrected itself and they were able to drive home.

Simple fixes for bad battery connections

In this article we will discuss bad connections, starting with the battery and ending with, well, the battery. Seemingly every week, we at Certified Transmission get a vehicle in that has an issue at the battery terminals; and if it isn’t causing an issue right now, it will sooner or later. Related Articles – The

The diagnostic value of the scope

There was a time in my career when replacing a computer was touch and go. I always tried to do my due diligence and eliminate everything else as a possible cause before replacing the computer, but sometimes that wasn’t enough, and I would miss something along the way. That was long before I learned how

Troubleshooting tips: Narrowing down the reasons for a no-shift situation

A customer brought their 2013 Ram 1500 equipped with a 5.7L/65RFE powertrain to our shop in Omaha, Nebraska, with a complaint that it “will not shift at times.” A quick scan of the truck revealed a P0750 (Low/Reverse Solenoid Circuit) code. I took the vehicle for a road test and was able to duplicate the

RRTech-Figure-1
Easy fixes to common transmission problems

Transmission makers are always throwing the repair industry curveballs. The challenges seem endless. Sometimes manufacturers will let us know of changes they are doing, while other times they let us figure it out as we go. I would like to go over a few examples we’ve encountered that may help you on a simpler installation

Other Posts

Raybestos introduces OE converter twin plate damper for Ford transmissions

Raybestos has introduced a new OE converter twin plate damper for Ford E4OD, 4R100 and 5R110W transmissions. Related Articles – Raybestos Powertrain introduces new A8LR1 friction and steel clutch plates – Sonnax introduces remanufactured TEHCMs for 6L80/90 – Alto introduces bushing for Mercedes 722.6 According to the company, this new product (part number RT4116X) is

Ford adds 1,890 jobs in Ohio for EV production, engine and transmission plants

Ford Motor Co. announced new investments and jobs in its Ohio automotive plants. Related Articles – Vehicle miles traveled rise in early 2023 – Stellantis transmission plants in Indiana to begin manufacturing electric drive modules – Announcing the winners of the Top 20 Products and Tools contest The company is investing $1.5 billion into Lorain County at the Ford

Raybestos introduces Ford 10R80 clutch pack

Raybestos Powertrain has introduced a new Ford 10R80 high energy clutch pack module (part no. RCP96-523). This kit contains 3 A Clutch, 5 B Clutch, 5 C Clutch, 6 D Clutch, 5 E Clutch, 4 F Clutch high energy OE replacement friction clutch plates. Related Articles – Solera launches Identifix Shop Manager – TransTec extends

Raybestos-600
Transtar highlights remote transmission oil cooling system

Transtar highlights the Hayden remote transmission oil cooling system, a remote cooler with a 10 inch fan. It comes preassembled with powder coated aluminum brackets, remote mount and 3/8 inch push-on. It covers GM, Ford, Dodge, Chrysler, Mopar and Ram transmissions. Related Articles – TransTec offers 8HP50/850RE overhaul kit – Alto adds friction and steel

Transtar-Remote-Transmission-Oil-Cooling-System-1400